Skip to content

Ginny Dougary

  • Home
  • About Ginny
  • Contact

The magpie that saved a miscreant: Abandoned as a baby by his bohemian father, Charlie Gilmour struggled with depression, drugs and a prison sentence for violent disorder until a tiny bird helped him fly free of his demons

27 August 2020 by Ginny Dougary

By GINNY DOUGARY FOR THE DAILY MAIL

Featherhood by Charlie Gilmour (Weidenfeld £15.99, 288pp)

Featherhood, it would be tempting to say, is where Helen Macdonald’s H Is For Hawk meets Gerald Durrell’s My Family And Other Animals.

But Charlie Gilmour’s memoir is so original and ingeniously wrought, it stands on its own as a book to which others will surely be compared.

His creation of Benzene — a baby magpie so named because of the Bermondsey scrapyard where she was found ‘with its puddles of petrochemicals’ — is as vivid and endearing as anything in the classics of animal literature.

It’s not surprising, particularly if you believe in nature as well as nurture, that Gilmour has a facility for graceful expression. 

Two gifted writers, the late Heathcote Williams and novelist Polly Samson, are his parents.

Featherhood is about Gilmour’s bids to track down the father who abandoned him at six months after a nervous breakdown: ‘Heathcote cut me and my mum out of his life like a tumour. He didn’t visit, didn’t write, never sent a birthday card.’

But it is also as much about raising Benzene until she is ready to be released and flies away.

The memoir is cleverly divided into headings relating to Benzene’s growth — Pin Feathers to Flight Feathers to Blood Feathers, then Nest And Egg — parallelling Gilmour’s own.

The two years when Gilmour and girlfriend, Yana (now his wife and mother of their baby), bring up Benzene (bringing her back to life, being dependable,) and the writer’s thoughts on his own life mirror his questions about nature versus nurture: who is his birth father and why did he ignore his only son?

Heathcote emerges as a figure who is as repellent as he is compelling. 

His first book The Speakers — published when he was barely out of his teens — was praised by literary behemoths Anthony Burgess, William Burroughs and Harold Pinter.

This early promise was followed by another literary surge, around the time of Gilmour’s birth, with the bestselling Whale Nation (the book Samson was involved in as a publicist, where she met and fell in love with its author), Falling For A Dolphin and Sacred Elephant.

There was a time when the poet was enough of a catch to hook model Jean Shrimpton, the great beauty of her day. 

An enduring part of the Heathcote legend is that, after The Shrimp left him for another swain, he set light to himself on her doorstep. 

The sad truth that emerges in his son’s book is that, behind the colourful stories and melodrama, the anarchist poet had serious mental problems, starting when he was 23 and a patient at a therapy centre in France, ostensibly for alcoholism, and progressing to suicide attempts, another spell in his 30s in Springfield Hospital for the mentally ill, and the breakdown after Charlie’s birth.

Gilmour shows skilfully how rejection can become a form of addiction for the wounded child constantly returning for more: ‘It was a complicated longing. 

A feeling of guilt and shame. A bird beating its head against a windowpane.’

Heathcote would agree to meet his son, then disappear, blanking his child for years at a time. 

Gilmour’s first encounter with his birth father was at age 12, followed by another at 17 and the pivotal one, when he was a 20-year-old student.

After this visit he was left feeling empty and at fault, as Heathcote told him there was no parental obligation or explanation due on his part because ‘well, you were an accident’ — and all the time, ‘his eyes were begging me to leave’.

Each disappearance was more upsetting than the last, Gilmour writes, and only at the end of Heathcote’s life was there a glimmer of reconciliation, when the old man, with his filthy fingernails and gnarled knuckles, grasped his son’s hand as he lay dying in hospital.

Gilmour’s crash came at the student tuition fees protest demonstration in 2010, where he was filmed swinging on the flag at the Cenotaph and which led to him, aged 21, being given a 16-month prison sentence for drugs-related violent disorder (he was released after four months). 

Gilmour reveals the circumstances leading to his behaviour — after that painful meeting with his father, he suffered his own breakdown and was in a full manic drugs psychosis. 

As he points out, it might have been more appropriate for him to have been sent to a mental hospital, like Heathcote, instead of prison.

What is so clever about the balance of the book is that just as your heart feels like it is being crushed by the sadness of the boy’s attempts to be accepted by his father, the narrative returns to Benzene.

And she is such a cheeky, curious character. She even seems to have a sense of humour — and she can talk!

When Charlie’s maternal grandmother, a former major in Chairman Mao’s army, tries to teach the magpie to say ‘F*** Trump’, Benzene couples ‘Come on’ with the President’s name, squawking ‘Come on, Trump!’, thereby suggesting — embarrassingly, for Charlie and his family — that the family are Number One fans when he is their least favourite President. 

Gilmour’s language is as precise as his gaze is forensic. He is something of a magician himself, conjuring whole vivid personalities with a few deft strokes of his pen.

He can slay you with his succinct summoning of a small boy’s struggles, such as when, as a child, he met people who told him they knew his father: ‘Oh really,’ I’d reply brightly. ‘What’s he like?’

And he can dazzle you with the gem-like images of nature he creates which, like all writers who draw you into their orbit, thrum with life.

Benzene’s new ‘purple-shining feathers emerge like amethyst from a cave wall’. She sits at the highest point of an oak ‘dripping gold in the sun. 

The oak’s . . . leaves seem almost liquid in this light; fresh and wet as an emergent luna moth’s wings.’

Every line shows considered thought but never reveals the hard chiselling behind it.

When Heathcote left his son and partner with no warning after a happy day in the bluebell woods, it was spring: ‘The year’s new leaves unfurled and his mind unravelled.’

Throughout, in the background, is the steady, unmercurial figure of his adoptive father, David Gilmour, who married Samson when Charlie was an infant. 

As a rock star best known for Pink Floyd, he nevertheless lacked the tainted glamour of Williams — precisely because he was always there for his son.

This memoir is remarkable in many ways, one of which is that the reader understands how much it takes to achieve the maturity to realise what being a father means: the recognition — which finally frees Charlie — that ‘who your father is, isn’t who you have to be. Nurture trumps nature. It has to.’

By the end, you may find yourself looking at that magpie in your garden in a whole new way, too.

27th AUGUST DAILY MAIL BOOK OF THE WEEK

If you would like to reprint this article, please click here

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Back in the Dock

Next Post:

Actor Alan Davies on why he won’t talk about ‘the A-word’

Award-winning journalist and writer

“May the dance never end, and may journalism never be controlled.”

Search

Categories

  • Actors
  • Architecture
  • Artists
  • Book Reviews
  • Broadcast
  • Celebrities
  • Comedians
  • Crime
  • Fashion
  • Film
  • Food
  • General
  • Music
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politicians
  • Radio
  • Reviews
  • Sport
  • Theatre
  • Travel & Adventure
  • Uncategorised
  • Women
  • Writers

Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • November 2004
  • June 2004
  • March 2004
  • December 2003
  • July 2003
  • May 2003
  • November 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2000
  • June 2000
  • February 2000
  • October 1999
  • March 1999
  • November 1992
© 2026 Ginny Dougary