Skip to content

Ginny Dougary

  • Home
  • About Ginny
  • Contact

Mike Figgis: ‘Why I don’t do porn’

20 August 2011 by Ginny Dougary
JON ENOCH FOR THE TIMES

A conversation with Mike Figgis can lead you into unexpected places — such as why a Gypsy once steered him to swim around the reeds, in what way he might be a Geordie Buddhist and the impossibility of making porn sexy. For someone who is associated with rather brooding, intense films, he has a lightness about him that extends to his humour. His favourite joke, for instance, is this (prompted by him extending bags of sugary offerings across his desk): [An elderly lady’s voice, with an extreme Scottish accent] “Vicar, would you like a cup of tea or a meringue?” “No, you’re right — I would love a cup of tea.”

We are talking in the office of his Red Mullet company — two floors of studio space where he takes photographs, one of his many interests. At the top of the stairs is a big sexy photograph of Eva Green, scantily clad in a black body, smoking a cigarette. He mentions the campaign (a series of short films and photographs) that he did for Agent Provocateur some years back, featuring Kate Moss in lacy knickers and high heels — which must have been a chore for him. “Yes, terrible. Bloody hell,” he says, deadpan. Is she fun? “Yes, of course she is. That’s what she is, she’s fun.”

The usual rigmarole for him when he is being snapped is that the photographer (invariably male) turns up with at least three cameras and huge lenses “and then sometimes they lie on the floor and you think, ‘Oh-oh, the beached-whale look . . .’” He’s referring to the unflattering angle of the jawline when you’re photographed from below. He is tall and skinny in person, in his black jeans, his halo of curls slightly damp in the heat and a surprising pair of fluorescent punk yachting shoes.

As the chairman of the fundraising committee for the Photographers’ Gallery in London Figgis puts on events all over the world to raise awareness of the space. He shows me a book of the Hong Kong pop-up exhibition, “and it’s great, it’s like speed dating: you have 15 minutes per sitter, print immediately and put the photos on the wall.”

Figgis is keen on the pop-up idea per se, particularly for his films, since he appears to be going through one of his hacked-off-with-Hollywood phases. After his movie debut in 1988, Stormy Monday, a noirish thriller, came his first Hollywood film, Internal Affairs, a crime thriller that was widely considered to have relaunched Richard Gere’s career.

Leaving Las Vegas, in 1995, was made like an arthouse film (low budget, Super 16mm, shot in four weeks) and was a form of V-sign to the big studios after he had been mucked about on his previous film, Mr Jones. Despite Leaving Las Vegas being phenomenally depressing — about an alcoholic screenwriter who goes to the city to drink himself to death — it was a commercial and critical success, garnering half-a-dozen Oscar nominations (including one for Figgis) and the big gong for the lead, Nicolas Cage.

There was a Disney thriller, Cold Creek Manor, in 2003 — and now that Figgis, at 63, is ready to make another feature film “having not bothered for quite a while”, Hollywood does not seem interested. The new film will be called Suspension of Disbelief, about a writer and the film business. Autobiographical? “Philosophically for sure, but it would also be a philosophical discourse, it could be a thriller, it could be sexy, a page-turner and so on.” Figgis called a distribution company and spoke to a “guy who I’ve known for a long time and he kept saying, ‘We love it, we just love it’, rah-rah-rah, and I said, ‘So are you interested in coming in with some dosh?’ There was a pause and he said, ‘Mike, unfortunately [the American film critic] Pauline Kael is dead and with her, her audience’. And I went, ‘Wow! That’s such a f***ing pessimistic thing to say and I don’t agree. In fact, I think there is a massively bored audience out there who are dying to be given something slightly different from the bland films they are being offered’.”SPONSOREDThe secret of the SMEs that are emerging stronger than everThe artificial intelligence start-up that thrived throughout crisis

His answer will be to show his film in a pop-up cinema: “I’m gonna make this film one way or another, if I have to do it with favours from actors, or whatever, and I’ll open it like a play … find a space that’s empty, put a time limit on it of, say, three months, and people are really interested in an event space that’s partly a club, partly a cinema, a bar, a restaurant … where you can sit around afterwards in fairly comfy seats and talk. I would like to curate that.”

In the meantime, Figgis is curating a wild-sounding weekend festival at the Royal Opera House — in the anarchic spirit, perhaps, of his years as a performer and musician (he plays trumpet, piano and guitar, as well as scoring his films and plays) in the experimental performance group The People Show. Writers, artists, film-makers and broadcasters — including Jon Snow, Peter Blake, Jeanette Winterson, John Berger, Paul Auster and David Lynch — have been asked to respond to Figgis’s chosen theme: Just Tell the Truth.

At the time that Figgis was approached, the WikiLeaks drama was unfolding and he was also struck by Ricky Gervais’ provocative performance at the Golden Globes; he thought “there’s something wonderful about aggressive truth. So you know — what is truth for an artist or an actor or a politician or a newsreader?”

What about his own relationship with the truth? How often does Mike Figgis lie? “I find it almost impossible to tell lies. It’s more a question with me of avoiding the truth; avoiding truthful confrontation.” You seem very gentle now but can you be a bit of a shit? “I’ve learnt that if you want to get something done, I’ll go in for confrontation and I can be nasty. My voice becomes very authoritarian, like a schoolmaster’s voice.” Was your father like that? “A little bit, yeah.”

When I say that I am riveted by his parents, Figgis grins and says: “Me, too.” After his father, Larry, left Haileybury, he joined the RAF as a pilot at the age of 18 and survived the Second World War despite being shot down five times. After the war, Larry Figgis had made his way to Nairobi with his wife, Kit — a beautiful young woman from a working-class family in Carlisle — and their five children. Mike’s grandfather owned a law practice, Daly & Figgis, set up in 1899. There was a large mansion, plenty of servants, glamorous connections and a lot of drinking. Mike’s father knew S. J. Perelman; and his mother worked for Ernest Hemingway who wrote her a series of letters. Larry got into debt and the family left Nairobi under a cloud, returning to Carlisle and eventually settling for a rather different life on a council estate in Newcastle upon Tyne. “We were very much thrown into learning to be incredibly watchful about where trouble was going to come from next because you’re a posh kid on a council estate, you don’t speak Geordie so you don’t know what people are saying,” he says. “But you learn very quickly and you learn that humour can be very useful and it sets off a real interest in the way that people behave.”

In the introduction to his book of interviews with Hollywood film-makers on film-making, published in 1999, there is an hilariously woeful account of Figgis’s first forays into Hollywood: the accretion of humiliation, the loneliness, the long waiting game. Since then Figgis has experienced very public rejections — both professional and personal — but he seems utterly positive and sanguine about the way that his life has turned out.

He is as interested in the dynamics of the male gaze on women’s bodies as he is on the effect that has on women; but the two narratives seem to co-exist rather uneasily in him. He worries a lot about the impact that some of his scenes may have on both sexes, such as the rape scene in Leaving Las Vegas, for which he conducted his own ad hoc research to satisfy himself that men were not turned on by it and that women did not find it gratuitous. I read out a quote — “Film doesn’t tend to recognise the sexual hunger of women” — and he says: “Who said that?” You said that, I say, and he exclaims: “Oh, I did? I was going to say, ‘What a good quote’!”

He elaborates: “Film is a visual medium and it’s predominantly made by men, distributed by men and therefore it’s a male-gaze venue. And because women work so well visually, it’s such an easy route and you go down that route over and over again. I do.” Why does he think that men are so turned on by lesbianism in films? “It’s two for the price of one and also you don’t have the embarrassment of having to see [a version of] yourself. Spit-roasting, for instance, where there’s a woman between a whole team of footballers where they’re hanging out watching each other, which seems very gay — because the woman is really a device for men to watch other men.”

He has been asked “many, many times”, he says, to make a porn film (the short films he made for his first opera, Lucrezia Borgia, staged at the ENO this year, were described by several critics as “soft porn”). “I think I wouldn’t do it because it’s a mistake to separate the sex from a story, and if you reduce sex just to a physical process then you’re just touching the surface.”

Moving to the personal, I ask him whether it made any difference to him whether Saffron Burrows, with whom he had a five-year relationship, left him for a woman (speculated at the time to be her fellow actress Fiona Shaw) or a man, and he says: “No difference at all. We’re still friends and your relationship is hopefully based on the feelings at that time. You take from it what was good and move on.”

Even when he was in Hollywood having a hard time, he says: “I was learning like crazy. You can waste so much time being offended or hurt but I get up in the morning and I can’t wait to get on with the day. I can’t believe that I’m still here, my brain’s still working, I still have ideas and the energy to do something with them. Rather than being miserable, I really don’t mind what happens economically — as long as you still have an environment in which you can do something creative, it’s all good news.”

He owes this healthy attitude to a Gypsy, who was telling fortunes at a church fête in Devon: “I went into the tent and she looked me straight in the eye and said, ‘Ah, you’re a fish. [He’s a Piscean.] Yes, your problem is when you come to the reeds you just ram into them. You need to learn to swim around the reeds’. And for the past 20 years that’s what I’ve been doing … swimming around the reeds.”

The Times

If you would like to reprint this article, please click here

Post navigation

Previous Post:

New Orleans

Next Post:

My affair of the heart

Award-winning journalist and writer

“May the dance never end, and may journalism never be controlled.”

Search

Categories

  • Actors
  • Architecture
  • Artists
  • Book Reviews
  • Broadcast
  • Celebrities
  • Comedians
  • Crime
  • Fashion
  • Film
  • Food
  • General
  • Music
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politicians
  • Radio
  • Reviews
  • Sport
  • Theatre
  • Travel & Adventure
  • Uncategorised
  • Women
  • Writers

Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • November 2004
  • June 2004
  • March 2004
  • December 2003
  • July 2003
  • May 2003
  • November 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2000
  • June 2000
  • February 2000
  • October 1999
  • March 1999
  • November 1992
© 2026 Ginny Dougary