Skip to content

Ginny Dougary

  • Home
  • About Ginny
  • Contact

Does The Fall glamourise violence? Gillian Anderson and writer Allan Cubitt defend their thriller

13 November 2014 by Ginny Dougary

Allan Cubitt, the writer of The Fall – BBC2’s highest-rating drama launch in eight years – arrives first, early for our interview. He is a slightly rumpled-looking man, with kind brown eyes. Next is Gillian Anderson, aka DSI Stella Gibson, tiny and chic in high heels, her manner immediately friendly and later quite fierce.

I have recently seen her in the National Theatre film of the stage production of A Streetcar Named Desire. From the moment that she totters onto the stage, with an air of jittery entitlement, she owns the role of Blanche DuBois. It is a devastating performance and one that garlanded her with rapturous reviews and a sold-out season.

We are here to discuss The Fall, primarily, but given Anderson’s sense that DuBois was a part she was destined to play, we touch on it briefly. She says that her favourite response is one she read by someone who had attended a screening in New York. “They were at a movie theatre in New York, and when the lights went up, the entire row behind them went, ‘JESUS CHRIST!’ Hahahaha. I just loved that.”

She has said that she’d known for a very long time that she wanted to play Blanche, but it took her a while to work out why. “I couldn’t answer that question when I started to do the pre-press for it – but I started to get an idea once we started rehearsal… and it’s almost unmeasurable. It was a cellular response, I think.”

“I hadn’t remembered until I started working on one of the monologues that I had done one of hers before, and then my mother remembered that I had entered a competition when I was in school, aged around 16, and I got to national level. She sent me a picture of a trophy that I won and I didn’t have a single memory of it.”

Anderson has played tragic figures such as The House of Mirth’s Lily Bart and Lady Dedlock in Bleak House, as well as grotesques (Mrs Castaway, the ravaged Madame in The Crimson Petal and the White; Miss Havisham), so well and with so little vanity, it’s almost hard to remember that for years she was most famous as Agent Scully in The X-Files.

The synopsis of The Fall is this: serial killer Paul Spector, played by Jamie Dornan (above), is on the loose in Belfast. He is alarming for all sorts of reasons other than the fact that he kills young professional women. He is extremely good- looking (who wants to fancy a serial killer?), seemingly a loving father to two small children, a considerate husband, and works in the ultimate of caring professions as a bereavement counsellor.

This element was partly drawn from the author Ann Rule’s experience of working alongside the American serial killer Ted Bundy at a suicide helpline, and being impressed by his compassionate manner. “The idea that the bereavement counsellor is gaining, in some way, a weird emotional succour from other people’s grief,” as Cubitt says, “is very disturbing.”

The cleverness of the writing is that Gibson is also somewhat disturbing, as well as a compelling character. Initially, she comes across as coldly self-contained, only occasionally revealing glimpses of a more empathic person. As Anderson said after the screening of season two’s first episode: “She doesn’t reveal much about herself, so the little bits she does feel quite large.” Early on, Gibson invites a colleague (whom she hasn’t actually met but spies on the street) to her room for sex; he is married, and later shot dead.

Parallels are drawn between her objectification of a man she is attracted to, and the way women are often objectified by men – at its most extreme, by a killer such as Spector. Comparisons are also drawn between the growing twin obsessions of the killer and the woman who is determined to track him down. At the end of season one, Spector is on the run. Season two opens with his return and the threat of more murders.

Although The Fall’s reviewers were generally as enthralled by the series as its three million viewers, it also came under attack for supposedly glamourising violence against women. At the preview, Cubitt said: “One paper said it was the most disgusting drama ever seen on television, but I don’t see how that can be supported.”

He referred, as an example, to The Returned, the 2013 French drama in which a woman is stabbed in an underpass, and her internal organs then eaten by the killer: “I don’t see how anything in The Fall compares to that.”

The relaxed atmosphere of the interview tightens when I say – although I am definitely a fan of The Fall and can’t wait for the next season – that I do, at least, understand why some viewers have a problem with the way Spector lays out his victims. The gentle attendance to the corpse; the careful, even artistic, positioning of her on the bed is almost more creepy than the murder.

Anderson cannot see this viewpoint at all. “From my perspective, he’s posing these women as if they are posing for him – in seduction. It’s not a fashion magazine shoot type thing. It is what turns him on.

“This is the third interview I’ve done where it’s been referred to as glossy and glamorous and that is so far removed from what was intended.”

But, Gillian, I think this is because the way he stages his victims really does look like some kind of art-directed tableaux. Cubitt responds: “If that is the case, that would be a failure in direction…” Anderson: “But they don’t actually. I really want to make this clear. They actually don’t.” But isn’t it all to do with how the viewer responds? Cubitt: “If that’s the way you see them, that’s the way you see them.”

Later, after Anderson’s departure, Cubitt suggests that the art direction interpretation is, in fact, close to what he had been intending. It’s part of Spector’s aspirations towards intellectual thought, his quoting of Nietzche, his horrible “murder” notebook – full of observations and drawings: “There is the sense that he is being creative [with his victims] in some way. The idea that he thinks he is creating some kind of art installation.”

But that is exactly what disturbs people. “I didn’t direct the first season, so…” Cubitt says, with unexpected frankness. The first season was directed by Jakob Verbruggen, but as well as writing season two Cubitt will also be directing all six episodes.

Does he think it will have a very different quality because of that? “It’s bound to have.” Are there things you would have done differently? “There are many, many things I would have done differently. I mean, I was very involved with the editing, but you work with the material you’ve got.” Could you give me some examples? Pause. “It may be that the camera lingered too intimately on certain things…”

Another flashpoint with both Cubitt and Anderson, who is executive producer on this second season, is how much the writer intends to explain why Spector is the way he is. “There are two things I’d say about that,” Cubitt says, “One, is that we never know why people do the things they do. And, two, you don’t know why you do the things you do, either.”

Oh God, you’re not trying to tell me that we never discover why Spector is such a twisted individual? “What I’m saying is that there is a portion of ourselves that remains unknowable to other people and, indeed, ourselves…” Stop being such a tease! Will we ever know why?

Anderson jumps in: “But why do we need to know so much about somebody? The simplicity and sparseness [of the script] is what is pulling us forward and is so intriguing, but it’s almost as though we can’t take it at face value. But the reason why it’s as good as it is is because you don’t have all that stuff slapped on all the time.”

It’s fine at the beginning, but if we don’t get something of that towards the end, we are definitely going to feel cheated. Anderson: “But why?” Cubitt: “You’ll have to wait and see whether you feel cheated or not.” Anderson, again: “Yes, yes…but why?”

I say that we are all so used in the post-Freud era to analysing people – their motives, what it is about their past that informs their present – and frankly, it would mean that the viewer wasn’t engaged in the drama, if they had no curiosity about why the killer kills and why he is driven to do it in the way he does. This much seems obvious. It’s a difficult balance, isn’t it, as creator? You have to give the audience just enough…

“I don’t want people to feel profoundly unsatisfied,” Cubitt says. Are we going to learn anything in this series about Spector’s upbringing? “It would be odd if we didn’t, wouldn’t it? Nobody who comes from a happy childhood ends up doing those things.” The abandoned house, with the mannequin – is it going to feature in season two? Cubitt: “If I tell you, you can’t tell anyone else…” I think that’s my answer!

Stella Gibson’s silk blouses, like Sarah Lund’s sweaters in The Killing, have taken on a life of their own. Even Cubitt mentioned them, I say, and he looks a bit alarmed, even guilty. “Did I?”

Anderson sighs: “Literally every interview, I am asked about the blouses.” Oh, well, in for a penny… How was the decision made about them? Maggie Donnelly, the costumier, came down to Anderson’s house and they both instantly agreed how Gibson would dress.

“It almost felt like it was in the script, somehow between the lines… She isn’t interested in dressing like a man; she’s not using her clothes to get anything from anybody else – it’s not a device. She’s dressing for herself. She has good taste – you can just tell. I don’t know how, it’s hard to say – but you can tell from the page somehow how she takes care of herself. But it’s for herself and for herself alone.”

Anderson was famously a handful in her teens; not fitting in well into a school in middle America after a childhood in bohemian north London. Even now, there is a glint of something mischievous, bordering provocative, in her eyes. At other times, she can sound like a bossy prefect or curt school marm, slipping seamlessly from hauteur to hilarity without warning.

Up close, her fine, chiselled face is lovelier, in a way, for the faint signs of wear and tear around her eyes. I warmed to her from the start, when I told her that I’d bumped into Alison Steadman on my way to the interview and had been unable to stop myself saying: “Alison – I love you!” “Ahhh,” Anderson said, with affection. “I did the same thing to her. She was rehearsing something when I was rehearsing Streetcar, and I literally stopped in the middle of the room, like this [wide-eyed, open-mouthed, throwing her arms out] – ‘It’s you!’ ”

At the preview of the second series of The Fall, Anderson appeared on stage wearing a very large gold motorbike helmet. It belonged to someone in the audience who had mislaid it. “I don’t know why I did it,” Anderson says, with a remote expression. “I was just being silly.”

I’d read that she’d like to do a comic role but nobody thinks… “I’m funny!” she explodes with laughter. I was going to say, nobody thinks of her that way. Would you really like to be cast in a comedy? “Yes! Yes! Absolutely. I’ve actually done quite a lot of comedy but nothing anyone’s ever seen,” another burst of laughter.

She has been approached to do more classical roles but had always wanted to wait until she’d performed Streetcar first: “At some point, there is Hedda Gabler. I actually had fantasies for a long time of doing Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? with Philip Seymour Hoffman – which unfortunately is not possible any more.”

After she has gone, we discuss Spector’s rage, and Cubitt talks in an unguarded way about his own anger issues. “I, myself, have had a violent temper – not to the point of being violent to another human being,” he says. “But when I was younger, I could smash things up if I got really frustrated by something, but I don’t know why.

“There must have been something going on in the dynamic of my family when I was little to make me have that temper, but I don’t know what it was. I could probably speculate about a few things but I can’t be certain.”

Cubitt started out writing plays. He has a masters in English literature and was particularly enthusiastic about the Jacobean playwrights, “which would have slightly informed the way I wrote about those [violent, bloody] themes”. The title of The Fall, itself, was inspired by John Milton: “The thought I had was that all the characters fall from grace at some point.”

So here’s your challenge: write a comic play for Gillian Anderson. Are you up for it?

“Maybe a drama?” he grins. “I do have a commission from the National that I haven’t got round to doing. Funnily enough, I put comic moments in The Fall and then I cut them out in the editing room because they don’t feel right!”

Radio Times

If you would like to reprint this article, please click here

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Nicky Campbell on litter, his passion for music and being moved to tears by Long Lost Family

Next Post:

Star of wonder: an audience with Kristin Scott Thomas

Award-winning journalist and writer

“May the dance never end, and may journalism never be controlled.”

Search

Categories

  • Actors
  • Architecture
  • Artists
  • Book Reviews
  • Broadcast
  • Celebrities
  • Comedians
  • Crime
  • Fashion
  • Film
  • Food
  • General
  • Music
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politicians
  • Radio
  • Reviews
  • Sport
  • Theatre
  • Travel & Adventure
  • Uncategorised
  • Women
  • Writers

Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • November 2004
  • June 2004
  • March 2004
  • December 2003
  • July 2003
  • May 2003
  • November 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2000
  • June 2000
  • February 2000
  • October 1999
  • March 1999
  • November 1992
© 2026 Ginny Dougary